Governance Document Management

This file lays out the process for creating, amending or removing key governance docs from the UK TRE Community.

The aim for this document is to make it transparent and easy for any member of the community to propose changes to the governance infrastructure of the community, keeping it dynamic, representative and decentralised!

Process

1. Suggesting

Open an issue on the community management GitHub repository using the ‘Governance document’ issue template, or submit this Google Form.

If you use the Google Form, the Community Management Working Group will create a GitHub issue related to what you submit.

You must provide:

If you are submitting a GitHub issue, you must also:

2. Agreed upon

The Community Management Working Group will discuss the proposal to:

The Community Management Working Group may either:

If the proposer is dissatisfied with the reasons for rejection, and cannot resolve these with the Community Management Working Group, they can submit an Objections

3. Drafted

Once accepted, the proposer works to draft the new or updated document.

This process must be done openly, allowing community members to comment on, suggest and review changes.

If you are suggesting removing a document, this step does not apply.

4. Open for review

Once drafted, the proposer alerts the Community Management Working Group.

They will review the document (to ensure it complies with our Community Principles), and open it for official review. The proposal will also be circulated with the community.

For editorial changes, the review period will remain open for 14 days, or whilst there are still outstanding objections, whichever is later.

For substantial changes, the review period will remain open for 28 days, or whilst there are still outstanding objections, whichever is later.

During this period, the document can be updated and amended as required.

5. Finalised

When the document has closed for review, the proposer can submit it for finalisation.

The proposer will submit the document to the Steering Group. The Steering Group will consider all community feedback and come to one of two conclusions:

If the Steering Group rejects the proposed document, the proposer can either close their suggestion, or return to step 3.

7. Tagged/released

If approved, the Community Management Working Group adds the document to the community management GitHub repository and to the UK TRE Community website.

Other notes

Appeal

If at any stage the proposer is unsatisfied with the reasons provided for objection, they can raise an Objection. Any appeals they raise will follow this process.


Outstanding discussion & objections

The above is the current live and used process. Any ongoing discussions about amendments to this process will be linked here!